Colorado Springs Sports Injury Lawyer
Key Takeaways
- Deadline: 3 years if a motor vehicle was involved (C.R.S. 13-80-101(1)(n)); 2 years for most other injury claims (C.R.S. 13-80-102).
- Who is liable: Usually the uphill skier — Colorado's Ski Safety Act, C.R.S.
- If you were partly at fault: damages are reduced by your share and barred entirely at 50% (C.R.S. 13-21-111).
- Where it is filed: El Paso County Combined Courts, 270 S Tejon St, Colorado Springs, CO 80903.
Who is at fault in a ski accident in Colorado?
Usually the uphill skier — Colorado's Ski Safety Act, C.R.S.
33-44-109(2), places the duty on the person coming from above to avoid the people below. The Act also draws the line that decides most of these cases: a collision with another skier is not an inherent risk of skiing, so it is not something you accepted by buying a lift ticket. Collisions caused by another person's negligence remain claimable.
Can I sue if I signed a waiver or accepted the risk?
Often yes, and the waiver is not the last word.
Colorado's Ski Safety Act bars claims for the inherent risks of the sport — terrain, snow conditions, weather — but conduct beyond those, another participant's negligence, defective equipment and a facility's own failures are outside that bar. Waivers are enforced when properly drafted and fail when they are not, and a parent's release of a child's own claim is treated differently again. Keep the document.
A signed waiver and the risks built into a sport do not bar every Colorado claim. You assume the inherent risks of an activity — and on the slopes C.R.S. 33-44-112 bars any claim against a ski area for those — but negligence beyond the inherent risk is still actionable. The clearest example is written into the statute itself: C.R.S. 33-44-109(1) says the risk of a skier-versus-skier collision is neither an inherent risk nor a risk assumed by a skier. Claims against a ski area must be brought within two years (C.R.S. 33-44-111). Call (719) 475-2555 for a free consultation.
Can You Sue for a Sports Injury in Colorado?
Yes, in the cases where the harm came from negligence rather than from the sport itself. Colorado law asks you to accept the risks that are inherent in an activity — and against a ski area, C.R.S. 33-44-112 bars those claims outright. It does not ask you to accept a coach who ignored a concussion protocol, a rental shop that never inspected the bindings, or another skier who hit you, which C.R.S. 33-44-109(1) says is not an assumed risk at all.
Two doctrines get treated as if they end the conversation, and neither does. Assumption of risk covers what is inherent in the activity — a hard tackle in football, moguls on a run — not a coach who ignored a concussion protocol or a rental shop that handed over bindings it never checked. A waiver is a contract, and a contract is read for what it actually says. The question is never “was there a waiver” but “does this waiver, under Colorado law, reach this conduct.”
What Does Colorado's Ski Safety Act Actually Bar?
It bars claims against a ski area for the inherent dangers and risks of skiing — and nothing wider. C.R.S. 33-44-112 is absolute as to those risks. But the same article, at 33-44-109(1), carves out the case people most often assume is hopeless.
| The situation | Barred? | Authority |
|---|---|---|
| Injury from an inherent danger or risk of skiing, claimed against a ski area | Yes — barred outright | C.R.S. 33-44-112 |
| Another skier collides with you | No — expressly not an inherent risk and not assumed | C.R.S. 33-44-109(1) |
| Claim against a ski area outside the inherent risks | No, but must be filed within 2 years | C.R.S. 33-44-111 |
| Injury on the premises of a rink, gym or field | No — governed by the Premises Liability Act | C.R.S. 13-21-115 |
Does a Waiver Signed for a Child Hold Up?
In Colorado a parent may waive a child's prospective negligence claim. C.R.S. 13-22-107 says so, and it says why: the legislature wanted children to have “the maximum opportunity to participate in sporting, recreational, educational, and other activities.”
That is a real obstacle and worth knowing before you are told there is no case. It is not the end of the analysis: a waiver reaches the negligence the parent agreed to accept, not conduct outside it, and the document has to actually cover the entity being sued and the activity that caused the harm. Bring the paperwork to the consultation — it is usually the first thing worth reading.
Who Can Be Liable for a Sports or Recreation Injury?
Whoever's negligence went beyond the risk you accepted. A facility, a coach or league, an equipment renter or manufacturer, a transport operator, or another participant.
| Who | When they are on the hook |
|---|---|
| A facility or landowner | Unsafe condition on the premises — C.R.S. 13-21-115 |
| A coach, school or league | Ignoring its own protocol, including return-to-play after a head injury |
| An equipment renter or manufacturer | Gear that was defective, or never inspected before it was handed over |
| A ski area | Conduct outside the inherent dangers and risks of skiing |
| Another participant | Conduct beyond the risk of the sport — and a skier-versus-skier collision is never an assumed risk |
What About Concussions and Head Injuries?
A head injury is the sports claim most often missed at the time and most serious later. Symptoms can present differently in different athletes, and a return-to-play decision made without a protocol is the failure that turns one concussion into a lasting injury.
Where a coach, school or league had a protocol and did not follow it, that is negligence outside the inherent risk of the sport. See our page on traumatic brain injury claims, and our reporting on concussions and sports injuries.
What Are the Deadlines on a Colorado Sports Injury Claim?
Two years in most cases, and the ski-area deadline is its own statute. Do not assume the general injury deadline applies to every defendant in the same incident.
| Claim | Deadline | Authority |
|---|---|---|
| Against a ski area operator | 2 years | C.R.S. 33-44-111 |
| Most other injury claims | 2 years | C.R.S. 13-80-102 |
| If a motor vehicle was involved | 3 years | C.R.S. 13-80-101(1)(n) |
| If you were partly at fault | Recovery barred at 50% | C.R.S. 13-21-111 |
Which Colorado Statutes Govern a Sports Injury Claim?
These are the controlling sections, quoted in full from the Colorado General Assembly’s own published text.
C.R.S. 33-44-109(1) — duties of skiers
(1) Each skier solely has the responsibility for knowing the range of his own ability to negotiate any ski slope or trail and to ski within the limits of such ability. Each skier expressly accepts and assumes the risk of and all legal responsibility for any injury to person or property resulting from any of the inherent dangers and risks of skiing; except that a skier is not precluded under this article from suing another skier for any injury to person or property resulting from such other skier's acts or omissions. Notwithstanding any provision of law or statute to the contrary, the risk of a skier/skier collision is neither an inherent risk nor a risk assumed by a skier in an action by one skier against another.
C.R.S. 33-44-111 — statute of limitation
Statute of limitation. All actions against any ski area operator or its employees brought to recover damages for injury to person or property caused by the maintenance, supervision, or operation of a passenger tramway or a ski area shall be brought within two years after the claim for relief arises and not thereafter.
C.R.S. 33-44-112 — limitation on actions for inherent dangers and risks of skiing
Limitation on actions for injury resulting from inherent dangers and risks of skiing. Notwithstanding any judicial decision or any other law or statute to the contrary, including but not limited to sections 13-21-111 and 13-21-111.7, C.R.S., no skier may make any claim against or recover from any ski area operator for injury resulting from any of the inherent dangers and risks of skiing.
Why Choose The Bussey Law Firm for a Sports Injury Claim?
Timothy Bussey has represented injury victims across El Paso County since entering private practice in 1997, and the firm handles these claims from its Colorado Springs office at 12 E. Boulder Street. Consultations are free — call (719) 475-2555, or see our personal injury practice.
Meet Our Sports Injury Attorney
Timothy R. Bussey
Timothy R. Bussey is the founder of The Bussey Law Firm, P.C. Since entering private practice in 1997 he has represented injury victims across El Paso County. He is a Fellow of the Litigation Counsel of America and a recipient of the Martindale-Hubbell Gold Client Champion Award.
Read more on Timothy Bussey’s profile, or see case results. Reviewed by Benjamin Wilcox.
Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Every case is decided on its own facts.
Additional Information
Sources and References
- Colorado Revised Statutes, Title 13 (Colorado General Assembly)
- Colorado Revised Statutes, Title 33 (Colorado General Assembly)
- El Paso County Combined Courts — Colorado Judicial Branch
Statutory text quoted verbatim from the Colorado General Assembly’s published 2024 revised statutes, retrieved 21 August 2026. This page is general information, not legal advice.
What Are the Colorado Deadlines and Rules on This Claim?
Which deadline applies depends on how the injury happened, not on what it is called. Colorado gives three years to a claim arising from the use or operation of a motor vehicle and two years to most other injury claims. Missing the deadline normally ends the claim regardless of its merits.
| A claim arising from the use or operation of a motor vehicle | 3 years — C.R.S. 13-80-101(1)(n) |
|---|---|
| Most other personal injury claims | 2 years — C.R.S. 13-80-102 |
| If you were partly at fault | Damages reduced by your share, barred at 50% — C.R.S. 13-21-111 |
| Where a Colorado Springs claim is filed | El Paso County Combined Courts, 270 S Tejon St, Colorado Springs, CO 80903 |
Our Colorado Springs Office
The Bussey Law Firm, P.C.
12 E. Boulder Street
Colorado Springs, CO 80903
(719) 475-2555
Monday to Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.
Rated 5.0 from 203 Google reviews — see the firm on Google Business Profile.